All I can say about Asher and Lauer is
That's right. Nothing. I certainly read it. Didn't get it. I pray fervently for this week's facilitators.
The electronic reserve piece was a little more interesting (though large swathes were likewise unintelligible). Even now, I'm not sure what the researchers were really trying to accomplish. This shouldn't be the case: the reader, a grad student, not comprehending--after 2 hours of reading--what is going on.
Is this a symptom of some deficiency in me...or in the writing of the researchers...or in the presentation style of the "discourse" as a whole? What is wrong with writing simply, as clearly and succinctly as possible? Why the babbling jargon and long sentences crammed with many-lettered words of ambiguous meaning--sentences that are read over and over again, yet without any dawn of understanding???\
I look forward to the presentation tomorrow.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment